TARJIH MAKNA “AL-NA‘IM “ DALAM QS AL-TAKATHUR AYAT 8: ANALISIS LINGUISTIK TAFSIR AL-MISBAH
Main Article Content
Abstract
The interpretation of al-na‘i>m in Surah al-Taka>thur (102):8 remains disputed because the surah begins with a critique of worldly rivalry but ends with scenes of death, hell, and final accountability. This article examines the basis of M. Quraish Shihab’s preference for understanding al-na‘i>m as bliss in the hereafter and assesses the consistency of this interpretation with the linguistic evidence he employs. This qualitative, library-based study focuses on Tafsir al-Mis}ba>h} and the Qur’anic text, supported by classical lexicography, a Qur’anic concordance, and selected exegetical works. The analysis distinguishes lexical meaning, the use of na‘i>m elsewhere in the Qur’an, and its meaning within the context of Surah al-Taka>thur. The study verifies seventeen occurrences of na‘i>m: one in the verse under discussion and sixteen in other verses, all of which occur in contexts related to the hereafter. This consistent pattern provides the strongest support for Shihab’s interpretation, while his distinction among related forms and the context of the surah provide additional support. The study concludes that the meaning of bliss in the hereafter is more strongly supported, but not exclusive. The opening of the surah still connects the verse ethically with worldly favors for which human beings are held accountable.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
‘Abd al-Ba>qi>, Muh}ammad Fu’a>d. Al-Mu‘jam al-Mufahras li-Alfa>z} al-Qur’a>n al-Kari>m. Kairo: Da>r al-Kutub al-Mis}riyyah, 1364 H.
Ahla>l, S}a>lih} Sa‘i>d. “Lafz} (al-na‘i>m) fi> su>rat al-Taka>thur: Dira>sah muqa>ranah bayna aqwa>l al-mufassiri>n.” Majallat al-Ja>mi‘ah al-‘Ira>qiyyah, vol. 52, no. 1 (2021): 1-5.
Aiyub, Aiyub, dan Isna Mutia. “Muhammad Quraish Shihab's Methodology in Interpretation of the Qur’an.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu‘a>shirah vol. 20, no. 1 (2023): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.22373/jim.v20i1.16891.
Al-‘Andas, Fahd ibn ‘Ali>. “Al-ni‘mah wa-al-na‘i>m fi> al-Qur’a>n al-kari>m: Dira>sah mawd}u>‘iyyah.” Majallat al-Andalus li-al-‘Ulu>m al-Insa>niyyah wa-al-Ijtima>‘iyyah, vol. 38 (2020): 46-76. https://doi.org/10.35781/1637-000-038-002.
Al-As}faha>ni>, al-Ra>ghib. Mufrada>t alfa>z} al-Qur’a>n. Diedit oleh S}afwa>n ‘Adna>n al-Da>wu>di>. Damaskus: Da>r al-Qalam; Beirut: al-Da>r al-Sha>miyyah, 1412 H.
Al-Ra>zi>, Fakhr al-Di>n. Mafa>ti>h} al-ghayb. Cet. ke-3. Jilid 32. Beirut: Da>r Ih}ya>’ al-Tura>th al-‘Arabi>, 1420 H.
Al-T}abari>, Muh}ammad ibn Jari>r. Ja>mi‘ al-baya>n ‘an ta’wi>l a>y al-Qur’a>n. Diedit oleh ‘Abd Alla>h ibn ‘Abd al-Muh}sin al-Turki>. Jilid 24. Kairo: Da>r Hajr, 2001.
Bint al-Sha>t}i’, ‘A>’ishah ‘Abd al-Rah}ma>n. Al-tafsi>r al-baya>ni> li-al-Qur’a>n al-kari>m. Cet. ke-7. Jilid 1. Kairo: Da>r al-Ma‘a>rif, t.t.
Budiana, Yusuf, dan Sayiid Nurlie Gandara. “Kekhasan Manhaj Tafsir Al-Mishbah Karya M. Quraish Shihab.” Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas 1, no. 1 (2021): 85-91. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v1i1.11497.
Dukes, Kais. Quranic Arabic Corpus. University of Leeds, 2011. https://corpus.quran.com.
Naguib, Shuruq. “Bint al-Sha>t}i’'s Approach to Tafsi>r: An Egyptian Exegete's Journey from Hermeneutics to Humanity.” Journal of Qur'anic Studies 17, no. 1 (2015): 45-84. https://doi.org/10.3366/jqs.2015.0179.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Mishbah: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jilid 15. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2002.
Soleh, Achmad Khudori. “Bint Al-Shati' Critical Thematic Method and the Difference with Others.” AL QUDS: Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis vol. 5, no. 1 (2021): 399-416. https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v5i1.2610.
Syahputra, Muhammad Rizaldi. “Konsep ‘Nikmat’ dalam Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Iman dan Spiritualitas vol. 3, no. 3 (2023): 439-446. https://doi.org/10.15575/jis.v3i3.29851.